Biofuels: 'Irrational' and 'even Worse than Fossil Fuels'

Biofuels: 'Irrational' and 'worse than fossil fuels'

The UK's "irrational" use of biofuels will cost motorists around ₤ 460 million over the next 12 months, a think tank states.

A report by Chatham House, external states the growing dependence on sustainable liquid fuels will also increase food prices.

The author states that biodiesel made from vegetable oil was worse for the climate than fossil fuels.

Under EU law, external, biofuels are set to make up 5% of the UK's transportation fuel from today.

Since 2008, the UK has required fuel suppliers to include a growing percentage of sustainable materials into the fuel and diesel they provide. These biofuels are primarily ethanol distilled from corn and biodiesel made from rapeseed, used cooking oil and tallow.

Deep fried fuel

But research study performed for Chatham House states that reaching the 5% level implies that UK vehicle drivers will have to pay an additional ₤ 460m a year due to the fact that of the higher cost of fuel at the pump and from filling up regularly as biofuels have a lower energy material.

The report state that if the UK is to fulfill its commitments to EU energy targets the expense to vehicle drivers is most likely to rise to ₤ 1.3 bn per year by 2020.

"It is hard to find any excellent news," Rob Bailey, senior research study fellow at Chatham House, informed BBC News.

"Biofuels increase costs and they are a really pricey way to decrease carbon emissions," he stated.

The EU biofuel mandates are likewise having hugely distorting results in the market. Because utilized cooking oil is considered as one of the most sustainable kinds of biodiesel, the rate for it has risen rapidly. Rob Bailey states that towards completion of 2012 it was more costly than refined palm oil.

"It creates a financial reward to buy refined palm oil, prepare a chip in it to turn it into used cooking oil and after that offer it at revenue,"

"It is insane but the incentives are there."

There are likewise worries that taking EU land out of production to grow rapeseed oil in specific is producing more climate problems than it resolves. The more fuel of this type that is put into automobiles the bigger the deficit produced in the edible oils market. This had actually resulted in increased imports of palm oil from Indonesia, frequently produced on deforested land.

"Once you take into account these indirect effects, biofuels made from veggie oils actually result worldwide in more emissions than you would obtain from using diesel in the very first place," said Rob Bailey.

"Plus you are asking motorists to pay more for the fuel - it makes no sense, it is a totally illogical strategy."

Biofuel advantages

The European Biodiesel Board (EBB), which represents the market, external across the EU, stated it was aware of the issues triggered by the mandate. But it thinks that biofuels have numerous positives.

"Blaming biofuels for all the troubles on the planet is a bit too exaggerated," stated Isabelle Maurizi, task manager at the EBB.

"It has brought great deals of advantages. It has improved the security of our diesel; it has actually minimized EU dependency on animal feed imports, thanks to the rapeseed we grow for biodiesel."

"If there was no biodiesel farmers would just make their land idle - no food, no feed!"

As the UK strikes the 5% of liquid fuels mark, the federal government faces some hard decisions on how to move on on this issue as it faces tripling the costs for drivers by 2020.

Insiders recommend its choice would be to attempt and get contract in Brussels on the impacts of indirect expenses which may constrain what counts as biofuel. However getting arrangement from nations with powerful farming sectors who take advantage of the current arrangement will be difficult.

"When you have a lobby that includes the agricultural sector and the oil sector it is really difficult for Governments to make a U-turn," said Rob Bailey.

County starts recycling chip fat

8 December 2010