The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in participation, but the world-famous celebs were notably consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial websites using both free casino-style games and rewarding rewards, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to discuss claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos act as traditional casinos, only without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the business deals with allegations of unlawful gaming in a New York lawsuit that claims VGW uses star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm not exactly sure" if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of stars from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any differences in between traditional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of numerous sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where lots of - however not all - games are totally free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely promotes on social media

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads generally center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while omitting the potential for actual gambling losses.

Others tempt clients with pledges of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement displaying Drake's automobiles, airplanes and mansions before pivoting to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever provided up.'

The discrepancy in between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A representative for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.

'Most social sweeps customers never purchase,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling sites.'

Social casinos offer consumers a chance to play casino-style games with friends. Players have the alternative to purchase worthless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, however can be utilized to open numerous functions within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, allowing clients to get other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's cars and trucks, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7 states, which has actually helped to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require normally need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow consumers to submit mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully specific directions. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, thereby offering them a factor to try their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for a chance to win - or lose - genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a method of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are simply a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never need to spend for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an essential difference in between social sweeps and standard online sports betting websites like gambling establishments.'

Think about the method that McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that use them the chance to win lucrative rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself does not satisfy the definition of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all type of daily services in the United States, everything from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are regularly used by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling industry insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last permanently and they're typically not tied to casino-style video games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics frequently associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments offer" casino-like" payouts, typically 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the common payment percentage for a short-lived advertising sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the earnings made by the company [typically less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web cafes that sprang up in Florida, using customers the opportunity to play casino-style video games for real rewards. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually given that been shuttered over allegations of unlawful gambling.

DJ Khaled is among several star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments should deal with comparable scrutiny.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have repeatedly been cited by courts and state chief law officer as key consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion was in reality a guise for unlawful sports betting.'

One of the gambling establishment market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up substantial tax and income opportunities as this sports betting changes that performed through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current claim, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New York state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'unlawful gambling business. '

Apple and Google have actually also been called as accuseds in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We typically do not talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and stay confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play games across many of North America, as we have for more than a years, developing not just great video games, user experiences and entertainment, however likewise guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we mean to strongly protect any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The problems between conventional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove troublesome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues want to forecast a strong position against illegal sports betting - especially when attempting to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting apparently unlawful sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise ignored to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a duty to discuss to clients the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'Some of our worths are" our players come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful sports betting sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by customers who declare damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating prohibited sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton